• Login
    View Item 
    •   FFI Publications Home
    • Publications
    • Articles
    • View Item
    •   FFI Publications Home
    • Publications
    • Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Lack of behavioural responses of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) indicate limited effectiveness of sonar mitigation

    View/Open
    1530938.pdf (1.111Mb)
    Date
    2017
    Author
    Wensveen, Paul
    Kvadsheim, Petter Helgevold
    Lam, Frans-Peter A.
    vonBenda-Beckmann, Sander
    Sivle, Lise Doksæter
    Visser, Fleur
    Cure, Charlotte
    Tyack, Peter L.
    Miller, Patrick James O'Malley
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Exposure to underwater sound can cause permanent hearing loss and other physiological effects in marine animals. To reduce this risk, naval sonars are sometimes gradually increased in intensity at the start of transmission (‘ramp-up’). Here, we conducted experiments in which tagged humpback whales were approached with a ship to test whether a sonar operation preceded by ramp-up reduced three risk indicators – maximum sound pressure level (SPLmax), cumulative sound exposure level (SELcum) and minimum source–whale range (Rmin) – compared with a sonar operation not preceded by ramp-up. Whales were subject to one no-sonar control session and either two successive ramp-up sessions (RampUp1, RampUp2) or a ramp-up session (RampUp1) and a full-power session (FullPower). Full-power sessions were conducted only twice; for other whales we used acoustic modelling that assumed transmission of the full-power sequence during their no-sonar control. Averaged over all whales, risk indicators in RampUp1 (n=11) differed significantly from those in FullPower (n=12) by −3.0 dB (SPLmax), −2.0 dB (SELcum) and +168 m (Rmin), but not significantly from those in RampUp2 (n=9). Only five whales in RampUp1, four whales in RampUp2 and none in FullPower or control sessions avoided the sound source. For RampUp1, we found statistically significant differences in risk indicators between whales that avoided the sonar and whales that did not: −4.7 dB (SPLmax), −3.4 dB (SELcum) and +291 m (Rmin). In contrast, for RampUp2, these differences were smaller and not significant. This study suggests that sonar ramp-up has a positive but limited mitigative effect for humpback whales overall, but that ramp-up can reduce the risk of harm more effectively in situations when animals are more responsive and likely to avoid the sonar, e.g. owing to novelty of the stimulus, when they are in the path of an approaching sonar ship.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12242/826
    https://ffi-publikasjoner.archive.knowledgearc.net/handle/20.500.12242/826
    DOI
    10.1242/jeb.161232
    Description
    Wensveen, Paul J.; Kvadsheim, Petter Helgevold; Lam, Frans-Peter A.; vonBenda-Beckmann, Sander; Sivle, Lise Doksæter; Visser, Fleur; Curé, Charlotte; Tyack, Peter L.; Miller, Patrick James O'Malley. Lack of behavioural responses of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) indicate limited effectiveness of sonar mitigation. Journal of Experimental Biology 2017 ;Volum 220.(22) s. 4150-4161
    Collections
    • Articles

    Browse

    All of FFI PublicationsCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitles

    My Account

    Login

    CONTACT US

    • FFI Kjeller
      FFI, PO Box 25, 2027 Kjeller
    • Office Address: Instituttvn 20,
      Phone 63 80 70 00
    • biblioteket@ffi.no

    HELPFUL

    • About FFI
    • Career
    • Reports

    Sitemap

    • About cookies (cookies)
    • Newsletter
    • Sitemap

    FOLLOW US

     

     

    © Copyright Norwegian Defence Research Establishment
    Powered by KnowledgeArc