• Login
    View Item 
    •   FFI Publications Home
    • Publications
    • Articles
    • View Item
    •   FFI Publications Home
    • Publications
    • Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Comparative testing and evaluation of nine different air samplers: End-to-end sampling efficiencies as specific performance measurements for bioaerosol applications

    View/Open
    1126298.pdf (568.8Kb)
    Date
    2014
    Author
    Dybwad, Marius
    Skogan, Gunnar
    Blatny, Janet Martha
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Accurate exposure assessments are needed to evaluate health hazards caused by airborne microorganisms and require air samplers that efficiently capture representative samples. This highlights the need for samplers with well-defined performance characteristics. While generic aerosol performance measurements are fundamental to evaluate/compare samplers, the added complexity caused by the diversity of microorganisms, especially in combination with cultivation-based analysis methods, may render such measurements inadequate to assess suitability for bioaerosols. Specific performance measurements that take into account the end-to-end sampling process, targeted bioaerosol and analysis method could help guide selection of air samplers. Nine different samplers (impactors/impingers/cyclones/ electrostatic precipitators/filtration samplers) were subjected to comparative performance testing in this work. Their end-to-end cultivation-based biological sampling efficiencies (BSEs) and PCR-/microscopy-based physical sampling efficiencies (PSEs) relative to a reference sampler (BioSampler) were determined for gram-negative and gram-positive vegetative bacteria, bacterial spores, and viruses. Significant differences were revealed among the samplers and shown to depend on the bioaerosol's stress–sensitivity and particle size. Samplers employing dry collection had lower BSEs for stress-sensitive bioaerosols than wet collection methods, while nonfilter-based samplers showed reduced PSEs for 1 μm compared to 4 μm bioaerosols. Several samplers were shown to underestimate bioaerosol concentration levels relative to the BioSampler due to having lower sampling efficiencies, although they generally obtained samples that were more concentrated due to having higher concentration factors. Our work may help increase user awareness about important performance criteria for bioaerosol sampling, which could contribute to methodological harmonization/standardization and result in more reliable exposure assessments for airborne pathogens and other bioaerosols of interest.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12242/706
    https://ffi-publikasjoner.archive.knowledgearc.net/handle/20.500.12242/706
    DOI
    10.1080/02786826.2013.871501
    Description
    Dybwad, Marius; Skogan, Gunnar; Blatny, Janet Martha. Comparative testing and evaluation of nine different air samplers: End-to-end sampling efficiencies as specific performance measurements for bioaerosol applications. Aerosol Science and Technology 2014 ;Volum 48.(3) s. 282-295
    Collections
    • Articles

    Browse

    All of FFI PublicationsCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitles

    My Account

    Login

    CONTACT US

    • FFI Kjeller
      FFI, PO Box 25, 2027 Kjeller
    • Office Address: Instituttvn 20,
      Phone 63 80 70 00
    • biblioteket@ffi.no

    HELPFUL

    • About FFI
    • Career
    • Reports

    Sitemap

    • About cookies (cookies)
    • Newsletter
    • Sitemap

    FOLLOW US

     

     

    © Copyright Norwegian Defence Research Establishment
    Powered by KnowledgeArc