Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHansen, Roy Edgar
dc.contributor.authorCallow, Hayden John
dc.contributor.authorSæbø, Torstein Olsmo
dc.contributor.authorSynnes, Stig Asle Vaksvik
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-23T09:07:37Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-25T10:41:26Z
dc.date.available2017-10-23T09:07:37Z
dc.date.available2017-10-25T10:41:26Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationHansen RE, Callow HJ, Sæbø T, Synnes SAV. Challenges in Seafloor Imaging and Mapping With Synthetic Aperture Sonar. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 2011;49(10):3677-3687en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12242/715
dc.identifier.urihttps://ffi-publikasjoner.archive.knowledgearc.net/handle/20.500.12242/715
dc.descriptionHansen, Roy Edgar; Callow, Hayden John; Sæbø, Torstein Olsmo; Synnes, Stig Asle Vaksvik. Challenges in Seafloor Imaging and Mapping With Synthetic Aperture Sonar. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2011 ;Volum 49.(10) s. 3677-3687en_GB
dc.description.abstractSynthetic aperture sonar (SAS) is emerging as an imaging technology that can provide centimeter resolution over hundreds-of-meter range on the seafloor. Although the principle of SAS has been known for more than 30 years, SAS systems have only recently become commercially available. The success of SAS is critically dependent on overcoming several challenges related to the ocean environment. The sonar has to be positioned with accuracy better than a fraction of a wavelength along the synthetic aperture. We use the sensor itself for navigation, in combination with aided inertial navigation. The sound velocity has to be accurately estimated for successful focusing of SAS images. We calculate a simple rule of thumb for tolerance and show the effect of incorrect sound velocity. For nonstraight synthetic apertures, the bathymetry must be estimated. We use real aperture interferometry to map the scene before SAS processing. We calculate the required bathymetry accuracy and show the effects of insufficient mapping. Vehicle instability and nonstraight tracks, in combination with insufficient navigation accuracy, can cause grating lobes in the SAS images, which is not common in single-channel synthetic aperture radars. We show example imagery with severe grating lobes. In shallow waters, the acoustic signals will interact with the sea surface, possibly causing multipath. This will reduce the SAS quality. We use coherence to map the signal to multipath and, thereby, the valid sensor range. This paper illustrates the different challenges using examples from the HISAS 1030 interferometric SAS.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.titleChallenges in Seafloor Imaging and Mapping With Synthetic Aperture Sonaren_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.updated2017-10-23T09:07:37Z
dc.identifier.cristinID858460
dc.identifier.cristinID858460
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/TGRS.2011.2155071
dc.source.issn0196-2892
dc.source.issn1558-0644
dc.type.documentJournal article
dc.relation.journalIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record