Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFevolden, Arne Martin
dc.contributor.authorTvetbråten, Kari
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-17T06:45:53Z
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-19T10:14:10Z
dc.date.available2016-08-17T06:45:53Z
dc.date.available2016-08-19T10:14:10Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationDefence Studies 2016en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://ffi-publikasjoner.archive.knowledgearc.net/123456789/515
dc.descriptionDefence industrial policy – a sound security strategy or an economic fallacy? Arne Martin Fevolden and Kari Tvetbråten Defence Studies Vol. 16 , Iss. 2,2016en_GB
dc.description.abstractThis article explores whether it makes sense for national governments to employ defence industrial policies – such as offsets and discriminatory procurement practices – to support their domestic defence industries. This question has so far primarily been discussed by economists, who have argued strongly against the use of defence industrial policies. This article maintains that these economists fail to address the often complex motivation behind the introduction of these policies. It illustrates these shortcomings by contrasting their arguments against a case study of Norway, which accounts for the country’s use of defence industrial polices from the early post-Second World War era up until today. The article concludes that, depending on their objectives, defence industrial policies can be seen as either a sound security strategy or an economic fallacy.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.subjectForsvarsindustri
dc.titleDefence industrial policy – a sound security strategy or an economic fallacy?en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.updated2016-08-17T06:45:53Z
dc.identifier.cristinID1350550
dc.identifier.cristinID1350550
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14702436.2016.1169893
dc.source.issn1470-2436
dc.type.documentJournal article


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record