Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoxnes, John Fredrik
dc.contributor.authorHausken, Kjell
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-07T12:22:34Z
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-04T12:29:59Z
dc.date.available2014-03-07T12:22:34Z
dc.date.available2016-05-04T12:29:59Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationAdvanced Studies in Theoretical Physics 2012, 6(19):931-957en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://ffi-publikasjoner.archive.knowledgearc.net/handle/20.500.12242/449
dc.descriptionMoxnes, John Fredrik; Hausken, Kjell. Comparing VO2max Improvement in Five Training Methods. Advanced Studies in Theoretical Physics 2012 ;Volum 6.(19) s. 931-957en_GB
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a theoretical study comparing the improvement of the whole body maximum oxygen uptake (maximum aerobic power or VO2max) when training at different intensities and with different methods matched for total work performance and frequency of training. We compare VO2max improvement in five training methods, testing Helgerud et al.’s (2007) experimental study against Moxnes and Hausken’s (2008) theoretical model for athletic performance, fitness, and fatigue. The five methods are long slow distance running (LSD), lactate threshold running (LT), 15/15 sec interval training, 4x4 min interval training, and running at 87.5% of VO2max for 22.17 min. A weight function that scales the importance of aerobic utilization and stroke volume utilization is established.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.relation.urihttp://www.m-hikari.com/astp/astp2012/astp17-20-2012/hauskenASTP17-20-2012-2.pdf
dc.subjectYtelsesestimering
dc.subjectTrening
dc.titleComparing VO2max Improvement in Five Training Methodsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.updated2014-03-07T12:22:35Z
dc.identifier.cristinID953164
dc.identifier.cristinID953164
dc.source.issn1313-1311
dc.type.documentJournal article


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record