Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKnutsen, Bjørn Olav Haramen_GB
dc.contributor.authorPettersen, Elisabethen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-16T11:02:30Z
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-26T13:53:45Z
dc.date.available2024-02-16T11:02:30Z
dc.date.available2024-03-26T13:53:45Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationKnutsen, Pettersen. War in Europe, but Still Low Tension in the High North? An Analysis of Norwegian Mitigation Strategies. Arctic Review on Law and Politics. 2024;15:25-46en_GB
dc.identifier.issn2387-4562
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/268203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12242/3285
dc.descriptionKnutsen, Pettersen. War in Europe, but Still Low Tension in the High North? An Analysis of Norwegian Mitigation Strategies. Arctic Review on Law and Politics. 2024;15:25-46en_GB
dc.description.abstractRussia’s invasion of Ukraine has created the most precarious security situation in Europe, including the High North, since the Second World War. This article studies how Norway manages High North security dilemmas in the context of this ongoing war. Based on security dilemma theory, we direct our attention to a set of mitigation strategies and discuss the effectiveness of these. We build our arguments on Robert Jervis’ article “Cooperation under the Security Dilemma” in World Politics (1978), and his understanding that a security dilemma occurs when an increase in one state’s security leads to other states fearing for their own security, thus creating tension or conflict escalation. To limit such dilemmas, Norway has pursued a policy mix of both deterrence and reassurance measures. Our contribution to the research debate is the term mitigation-strategies, derived from security dilemma theory. First, we discuss people-to-people cooperation and analyse how this is a trust-building measure. Secondly, we explore how Norway approaches confidence and security building measures in the High North. Finally, we discuss the implications of letting the Arctic Council become an arena for security- and defence political coordination. Building upon insights from security dilemma theory, we demonstrate how Norway contributes to maintaining lower levels of tension in the High North.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.subjectNordområdeneen_GB
dc.subjectSikkerhetsanalyseen_GB
dc.subjectNatoen_GB
dc.subjectRusslanden_GB
dc.titleWar in Europe, but Still Low Tension in the High North? An Analysis of Norwegian Mitigation Strategiesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.updated2024-02-16T11:02:30Z
dc.identifier.cristinID2239416
dc.identifier.cristinID2239416
dc.identifier.cristinID2239416
dc.identifier.cristinID2239416
dc.identifier.doi10.23865/arctic.v15.5065
dc.source.issn1891-6252
dc.source.issn2387-4562
dc.type.documentJournal article
dc.relation.journalArctic Review on Law and Politics


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record