Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTorkildsen, Hans Erlingen_GB
dc.contributor.authorSkauli, Torbjørnen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-03T11:17:40Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-05T08:12:17Z
dc.date.available2018-12-03T11:17:40Z
dc.date.available2018-12-05T08:12:17Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationTorkildsen HE, Skauli T. Measurement of point spread function for characterization of coregistration and resolution: Comparison of two commercial hyperspectral cameras. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering. 2018;10644en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/74287
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12242/2477
dc.descriptionTorkildsen, Hans Erling; Skauli, Torbjørn. Measurement of point spread function for characterization of coregistration and resolution: Comparison of two commercial hyperspectral cameras. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering 2018 ;Volum 10644en_GB
dc.description.abstractFor spectral cameras, the spatial resolution and coregistration of bands are important performance characteristics. The paper discusses how these can be quantified in a way that is relevant for the spectroscopic processing step which is at the beginning of most spectral image analysis methods. It is argued that the most appropriate measure of resolution may be the ensquared energy of the mean point spread function (PSF) within the specified pixel field of view. For spatial coregistration, it is argued that a previously proposed coregistration metric is well suited, by characterizing the full shape and position differences between PSFs of different bands. A relatively simple method for imaging the PSF is demonstrated, based on tomographic reconstruction from line spread functions measured in different directions. The method is used to characterize two presumably comparable commercial hyperspectral cameras, a SpecIm PFD dating from 2012 and a HySpex VNIR-1600 dating from 2016. The measurements reveal significant differences, but it is pointed out that the present measurements by themselves do not constitute a proper comparison of the camera types. The main point made in the paper is that full characterization of the PSF in all bands is possible with moderate experimental effort, and provides clarifying measurements of actual camera performance.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.subjectTermSet Emneord::Spektroskopi
dc.subjectTermSet Emneord::Bildeanalyse
dc.titleMeasurement of point spread function for characterization of coregistration and resolution: Comparison of two commercial hyperspectral camerasen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.updated2018-12-03T11:17:40Z
dc.identifier.cristinID1637811
dc.identifier.cristinID1637811
dc.identifier.doi10.1117/12.2305503
dc.source.issn0277-786X
dc.source.issn1996-756X
dc.type.documentJournal article
dc.relation.journalProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record